Skip to main content

How long to train someone in sword fighting?

I'm curious about how long it takes to achieve any accomplishment in weapons mastery when the motivation is purely to have competency as quickly and efficiently as possible. At the moment the club I'm involved with is revising and putting together an updated training regime with the idea to bring a more organised program of development for the members, rather than the ad hoc instruction that had been the norm for some years.

One of the many interesting parts of this discussion is hearing the many views around how long a course of basic instruction should take to bring someone up to competence. Based on my experience I've been putting forward the view that we should be looking to produce a good level swordsman after a year's training.

Out of curiosity I also did a little research about training in the military and interestingly there seems to be a fairly consistent time periods for "basic" training from the Roman army to the modern military:

2-3 months for basic instruction
Up to 6 months - 1 year to complete training
1-3 years (or a few months in the field) to be fully competent/senior level
3+ years competent at instruction

For example in the modern British army basic training lasts six - seven months in total by which time you will are expected to be competent in shooting and with all the skills required of infantry. This training appears to breakdown into 3 months of skills instruction and then another 3 months of reinforcement and practical application. It's impressive when you consider that within the first three months they can teach a soldier to shoot from zero experience to passing the marksman exam.

Although these guys are training full time and the club is only training 1 or 2 nights a week I think there is transferable expectations for HEMA to be gleaned from this. Mostly because military basic training is teaching a huge variety of skills while club instructors are only teaching what would be a single element of a military education.

Of course this is dependent on a few factors: such as consistent attendance at training and a minimum basic level of fitess/coordination. But provided that people turn up and do not have to significantly improve their fitness I think this timescale is a good framework for HEMA studies: after a year most people should know/be trained enough to be average at fencing. If they've trained very hard they should be in the top 85 percentile.

It's also dependent on the body of knowledge available. However I would argue that even 20 years ago the body of knowledge for basic historical swordsmanship was well understood. As a minimum picking up a military sabre manual will impart the basics which are contiguous among all styles. While studying and recreating a specific style can take an indefinite amount of time, learning the basics of swordsmanship shouldn't.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kit mod: heavy sparring glove 2

This is a follow on to heavy sparring gloves and SPES arm protectors.

Finally: a pretty good HEMA glove.

Essentially I've created this final stage by removing the cuff from the gauntlet and attaching Velcro so the SPES arm & elbow protection attaches to the gauntlet. The Velcro attaches under the lip of the arm protection providing a solid join between the pieces.

My photography is lame but I hope you get the idea:



Good protection.

I would say that this setup has good protection from injury from sparring blows from fingers to elbow. Against full force blows it takes it down from injury to some mild discomfort and possibly light bruising, against moderate blows you feel some pressure with no discomfort. The fingers are where I've invested the heaviest protection but there is still some room for improvement.


Light weight

Because the weight is distributed along the length of the arm rather than at the wrist/hands end and because they can fit quite tightly to your body they seem…

Halberd Waster

Several times through my historical martial arts career I've got it into my head that I'd like to do halberd. However, the issues with a suitable waster have tended to put me off, specifically creating anything that can be used at something approaching full intention. The issue is that if you make the head from the usual materials (steel, aluminium, wood, leather etc) you have to exercise extreme caution at very slow speed because all you've made is a giant heavy mace on the end of a 6ft lever.

Recently I was working on making foam swords for another side project and while doing this it occurred to me that foam was the obvious solution to the halberd head issue. Pretty quickly I developed this simple waster.

The head is cut from EVA foam matting. This material is importantly both ultra light and pretty robust. To get a good strength I cut two head shapes out and stuck them together. The bracket to attach the head to the pole is just PVC piping with a slot cut into it for th…

Absolutely no absolutes

The more I study and learn of historical fighting, and the more I teach, the more I become careful in throwing around "absolutes" in terms of technique. I find that to say that something is "wrong" is a sub-optimal way of thinking about fencing that hinders development. Rather I like to highlight that everything is situational, i.e. with a proper understanding of the principles of fencing that there is often a time and a place where a particular technique is optimal and that you should not completely discount anything.

For example:

(and I'd like to make it clear that I'm not being negative on these examples, I liked and remembered both these videos I'm just using them to illustrate a pedagogical mindset.)

In this interesting video, the view is put forward that you should cut and step at the same pace to ensure that your hand and body land together. This is so that you cut with maximum strength and for reasons of balance.  The idea of not stepping and cu…